Decision Sciences
#20 of 26Editorial board composition
Decision Sciences ranks #20 among 26 fields. 9,492 positions across 159 journals. 8,841 editors. 28.2% female (below avg 33.7%). Mean h-index: 20.6 (below avg 22.7).
Gender distribution
Gender-inference coverage: 71.3% of editors here have an inferred gender — the 28.2% figure understates uncertainty for the unclassified remainder.
28.2% female · 71.8% male (of 5,865 resolved; global avg 33.7%)
Each editor counted once at this entity (composite identity key). Gender is inferred from the first name — not self-reported — and coverage drops for non-Latin-script names, which inflates the "unknown" bar in some countries.
Top countries
Board diversity
Per-editor diversity indicators. Each editor is counted once (composite identity key). The Shannon columns use Pielou's normalisation J = H / ln(k) so values are comparable across entities with different numbers of categories. See the methodology for full definitions, use cases, and references (Shannon 1948; Pielou 1966; Jost 2006).
org_type
field (education, healthcare, facility, government, nonprofit, company,
archive). Low values mean editors come overwhelmingly from one kind of
institution — usually universities, which account for about 82% of
editors dataset-wide. Higher values indicate editorial boards that reach
into clinical practice, public labs, industry, or scientific societies.